If you like the Illinois GOP, you’ll love Mitt Romney, Part 10.
Rick Santorum’s rise in the polls has brought attention back on the social issues. Too many people would prefer to pretend morality doesn’t matter. Twenty-five centuries of history prove that it does.
I’ve already addressed Mitt Romney’s cluelessness when it comes to morality here. If you follow the headlines, you can see how homosexual “marriage” is now on the horizon in Illinois. The parallels to Romney and Illinois’ clueless GOP are abundant.
If more Illinois voters can get themselves to actually THINK, then they will be forced to deal with the consequences in other states of an inept Republican Party. If you want to know more about what’s happening in Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts, visit www.massresistance.org. If you want to learn more about what’s happening in Maryland, read the following press release. It’s insane, I know. And so is pretending that that this kind of insanity isn’t on the way to Illinois if Republicans here don’t start cleaning up their own party.
Contact: Maryland Citizens for Responsible Government, 301-641-6420
OPINION, Feb. 21, 2012 /Christian Newswire/ — The following is submitted by Ruth Jacobs, M.D.:
What is it about Baltimore County councilmember Tom Quirk? He sponsors a “gender identity” bill to legalize transvestite behavior with the result that cross-dressing men will be able to enter the ladies’ room. Then he fails to understand how this could be a problem.
Naturally upset that they will be forced to share their bathrooms with men, a long line of women testified before Quirk and asked him to consider their privacy and safety concerns. Rape victims complained that his bill opens the door to peeping toms and cross-dressing men still sexually attracted to women. Yet Quirk ignores legitimate female concerns and self-righteously asks — “What would Jesus do?”
Yes, what would Jesus do about people like Thomas Lee Benson, a cross-dressing sex offender re-arrested for invading a female locker room? Would Jesus make it easier for Benson to enter the women’s locker rooms — again? That seems to be what Quirk believes.
When told that his bill discriminates against women by taking away privacy rights, Quirk tells us that “women cannot be discriminated against” because females are the “majority.”
Then why did it take until 1920 for women to have the right to vote, Mr. Quirk? Why aren’t we “majority” females able to use public bathrooms without worrying about men with lipstick and high heels barging in on us and our small children? Is it because we do not have the political power that transgenders and their gay lobby have? After all, we are just wives, daughters, mothers, and grandmothers, and not lobbyists with funding and a staff.
Gender identity laws dismiss women’s realistic concerns and enforce acceptance of a mental illness over reality. When women are not respected by society, they are more likely to lose rights.
Quirk also claims he doesn’t want discrimination against transgenders. Then he wouldn’t want discrimination against anyone based on sexual orientation, right? Yet members of the ex-gay community repeatedly asked Quirk to include former homosexuals in his bill, but he ignores them. If Quirk wants to protect people who changed their gender, why doesn’t he also protect people who have changed their sexual orientation? It seems he is providing protection only to his favored groups.
Tom Quirk, do the right thing and kill your gender identity bill — it discriminates against women.
Ruth Jacobs is the President of Maryland Citizens for Responsible Government.