I want to add a note in advance of Matt Barber’s column below. I saw the recent news items regarding the RNC/pro-life conference as well as the silly First Amendment and science-illiterate “GOProud” guy leaving the party (boo hoo!). If the Republican Party is smart, it’ll realize it can’t win without social conservatives, who, by the way, outnumber fiscal conservatives.
In the late 1960s the country listened to children — the ones who were rioting on college campuses and behaving as if they knew more than what thousands of years of Western thought had produced. Now after forty years of governmental fiscal irresponsibility and societal breakdown it’s time to learn our lesson and ignore the kids. If they don’t like the social issues, well, that’s too damned bad.
They need to grow up and learn about the life in “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” They need to learn how religious liberty trumps the desire of strange minorities who want everyone to embrace their odd sexual behavior and gender confusion. I realize that kids haven’t been taught science properly, but they’ll just have to learn that homosexuality is not the equivalent of race and is, instead, merely behavior. The Founders understood religious liberty meant the right to discriminate against what is seen by many as immoral behavior.
If the young people don’t like that then they can stick with the “cool” party that is bankrupting America. You know, that party that could care less about the debt being dumped on the next generation. The kids can stick with the party of Obamacare and socialized medicine, which is adding to the economic burden being put on the kids. They can be loyal to the political party that produces an economy where they have an enormous college loan debt and limited job prospects. Enjoy, kiddies.
They can do that — or they can get serious about learning what the liberals didn’t teach them while they sat in all those K-12-college classrooms. It’s called remedial education. The sooner they start, the sooner they’ll get up to speed and realize they’ve been mal-educated. Then they need to join with the side that’s working to repair the social fabric and wants to begin the massive task of addressing the economic mess caused by government at all levels.
Here’s Matt’s article…
By Matt Barber
I’m a Bible-believing Christian first, a conservative second and, sometimes, with rapidly dwindling frequency, a Republican third (but only when the Grand Old Party is behaving itself).
Although the GOP’s RINO establishment still controls its legislative reins, I’m mildly encouraged by some recent developments at the Republican National Committee (RNC) level. It seems that under the leadership of Chairman Reince Priebus, the party is moving – at least to some degree – back toward its historical conservative platform moorings.
It’s a popular refrain among “moderate” Republicans and libertine libertarians that the GOP “must give up the fight on ‘social issues’” (i.e., gun rights, religious freedom, protecting life and defending legitimate marriage and the natural family).
If the GOP follows through and abandons these transcendent conservative values, it’s done once and for all. The Republican Party had better run, not walk, back toward these conservative platform principles; otherwise Democrats will rule in perpetuity. The “progressive” juggernaut will finish off an America it has already maimed beyond recognition.
As I’ve noted before, Ronald Reagan often spoke of a “three-legged stool” that undergirds what I call “complete conservatism.” The legs symbolize a strong national defense, strong free-market principles and strong traditional social values. For the stool to remain upright, it must be supported by all three legs. If you snap off even one leg, the stool collapses under its own weight.
A Republican, for instance, who is conservative on social and national defense issues but liberal on fiscal issues is not a complete conservative. He is a quasi-conservative socialist.
A Republican who is conservative on fiscal and social issues but liberal on national defense issues is not a complete conservative. He is a quasi-conservative dove.
By the same token, a Republican who is conservative on fiscal and national defense issues but liberal on social issue – such as abortion, homosexual activism or the Second Amendment – is not a complete conservative. He is a socio-liberal libertarian.
Karl Rove represents the embodiment of this kind of mushy moderate false pragmatism – a Democrat-lite mindset embraced by the GOP’s socio-liberal establishment. If you run into Karl and his ilk, don’t forget to thank them for President Dole, President McCain and President Romney.
Indeed, if the Republican Party ever hopes to occupy the Oval Office again, it’s going to have to nominate a complete conservative and adopt a legislative agenda that reflects the values shared by the tens-of-millions who make up the GOP’s complete conservative base. I don’t mean by simply paying empty lip service either. I mean through unwavering legislative practice.
As Mitt Romney might tell you, if the base ain’t fired up, the base ain’t going to the polls.
In 2012, the GOP approved a platform that, at least in writing, re-established a firm position on – as they say – “guns, ‘gays’ and abortion.” It’s now time for the Republican Party to stand firm atop that platform. As a complete conservative who shudders at the thought of a President Hillary “Benghazi” Clinton, I’m cautiously optimistic that some in leadership are beginning to scale the platform once more. The RNC, under Priebus, has recently taken steps that seem to indicate the message of the GOP’s majority base is finally getting through.
For example, the Washington Times recently reported: “In an unprecedented show of opposition to abortion, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus is delaying the start of the party’s annual winter meeting so he and other committee members can join the (Jan. 22) March for Life on the Mall. …”
“‘I saw that there was a real interest among a significant portion of our members to attend and support the Rally for Life,’ Mr. Priebus said in an email to the Times. ‘This is a core principle of our party. It was natural for me to support our members and our principles,’” he said.
Moreover, this past Thursday was National Religious Freedom Day. In recent years we’ve seen religious freedom under attack at unprecedented levels through things like the HHS abortion mandate, so-called “gay marriage” and “sexual orientation” laws that target religious business owners. The RNC released the following statement indicating that the GOP intends to defend religious freedom:
“Today we celebrate National Religious Freedom Day and honor the vision of our founders, who ensured every American would have the right to ‘the free exercise’ of his or her faith. As a party, Republicans are committed to preserving and defending the protections enshrined in the First Amendment so that future generations will always enjoy religious freedom in America.”
This move back toward the GOP’s conservative platform has made some socio-liberal Republicans unhappy. In fact, it recently drove homosexual RINO Jimmy LaSalvia, the founder of GOProud, a tiny “gay activist” outfit, to announce that he was defecting from the party.
LaSalvia told Time magazine that, “he could no longer take his own party’s refusal to stand up to bigotry: he was leaving the Republican Party and had registered as an Independent.”
By refusing to “stand up to bigotry,” of course, LaSalvia, like all “gay” activists, means that he can no longer abide the Republican platform’s support for religious freedom and pro-family values.
LaSalvia’s frustration and defection bode well for the Republican Party in general. It means that the GOP is moving slowly – ever so slowly – back toward its conservative roots. This is good news indeed. The more conservative this prodigal GOP becomes; the more successful it will be going forward.
Keep it up, Mr. Priebus, and in November your base just might grill up the fatted calf.
Matt Barber (@jmattbarber on Twitter) is an author , columnist, cultural analyst and an attorney concentrating in constitutional law. Having retired as an undefeated heavyweight professional boxer, Matt has taken his fight from the ring to the culture war.
