Self marriage: Uh, right…ooookay…

In case you haven’t heard of “self marriage,” well, Lester Jackson reminded me of this craziness in a paragraph in this post at American Thinker…I’d encourage you to follow the links included if you want to learn more about it and a couple of other matters similarly nutty. People without a moral compass lose their common sense as well.

In June’s fiat declaring unconstitutional the Defense of Marriage Act’s limitation of federal marriage benefits to one-man-one-woman partners, five justices proclaimed that the Constitution forbids laws, even if overwhelmingly enacted, that they believe “demean … moral and sexual choices.” If that merits respect, shouldn’t it also apply to polygamy and marriage between family members? When a woman marries herself, are both self-marriage “partners” entitled to benefits? How are the morally superior five going to rule when, inevitably, NAMBLA and ZETA come calling to seek constitutional “civil rights” protection for men’s free “lifestyle choices” to have sex with boys and animals?