Here’s Kent Kellar:
Back in 2011, I shared a video that mocked libertarians by claiming that Somalia was their ideal no-government paradise.
I pointed out, of course, that the argument was silly. Sort of like claiming that North Korea is the left’s version of policy paradise.
But the video was very clever, and I’m more than willing to disseminate anti-libertarian humor if it’s clever and well done.
Some folks on the left, however, confuse satire with serious argument.
Consider the recent New York Times column by Nicholas Kristof. He wants his readers to think that advocates of small government somehow should be saddled with the blame for the dysfunctional nightmare of South Sudan. Seriously.
After hearing Republican presidential candidates denounce big government and burdensome regulation, I’d like to invite them to spend the night here in the midst of the civil war in South Sudan. You hear gunfire, competing with yowls of hyenas, and you don’t curse taxes. Rather, you yearn for a government that might install telephones, hire a 911 operator and dispatch the police. …Ted Cruz…is clamoring for: weaker government, less regulation… In some sense, you find the ultimate extension of all that right here.
Gee, isn’t Kristof clever. If you don’t support a bankrupt entitlement state and inane over-regulation, then you must want chaos and civil war.
Read more: Conservative Republican News
Image credit: danieljmitchell.files.wordpress.com.