Trump and the judge – It’s not about race, but the rule of law
By Brian C. Joondeph: Trump is one of few politicians willing to stand up to and call out those who place politics above the law.
Read MorePlease disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.
By Brian C. Joondeph: Trump is one of few politicians willing to stand up to and call out those who place politics above the law.
Read MoreBy Joseph Murray: How was it unreasonable to suggest that a judge belonging to a group pledging to advance Latino interests might be biased against Trump?
Read More
It’s big news that The Donald has publicly complained about the judge in his Trump University court case and he referred to the judge’s race. My question is — so what? The reason that…
Read MoreBy Pat Buchanan: First, Trump has a perfect right to be angry about the judge’s rulings and to question his motives. Second, there are grounds for believing Trump is right.
Read MoreBy Jeffrey Lord: Political conflicts of interest galore go uncovered in witch hunt against Trump.
Read MoreBy Sylvia Thompson: Every mature, intelligent person in this country knows that the judge in the Trump University case could very well be biased against Donald Trump.
Read MoreBy Newt Gingrich: The pleasant surprise in the Trump list of potential Supreme Court nominees is how diverse their law school backgrounds are.
Read MoreBy Eric Metaxas: The Supreme Court handed a big victory to the Little Sisters of the Poor and other Christian organizations.
Read MoreAn editorial from the National Review
Read MoreBy Robert L. McFarland: If the federal government, via the interpretive activity of one of its executive departments, can issue mandates to the states regarding bathrooms, it is hard to imagine an area of local…
Read More
Here is an abbreviated version of a post by the Heritage Foundation’s Alex Adrianson: That was the central question at this year’s Resource Bank. Here are some of the answers we came away with: 1….
Read MoreBy Adam J. MacLeod: A federal court has said a student’s subjective understanding alters the meaning of an unambiguous, federal law.
Read MoreBy Michael Bargo, Jr.: As Scotus expands personal rights, the rights of American citizens to exercise choice in other areas are being severely limited by Federal debt.
Read MoreBy Philip Ahlrich: The Supreme Court has only law to consider; therefore, it is not the prerogative of the court to decide on issues of moral justice.
Read MoreBy Kyle Sammin: Americans don’t like being told what to do, and we have long held an essential part of our liberty to be the right to say ‘no.’ Jury nullification is precisely that.
Read More