What Does the Second Amendment Mean?
By David Deming: Contrary to what some confused and unlettered judges think, the Second Amendment does indeed protect an individual right.
Read MorePlease disable your Ad Blocker to better interact with this website.
By David Deming: Contrary to what some confused and unlettered judges think, the Second Amendment does indeed protect an individual right.
Read MoreBy Hans von Spakovsky
Read MoreBy Howard Slugh: If judges decide cases based on their personal beliefs, there is no rule of law.
Read MoreBy Ben Johnson
Read MoreBy Thomas Sowell: The “advice and consent” provision of the Constitution is a restriction on the President’s power, not an imposition of a duty on the Senate.
Read MoreBy Bruce Walker
Read MoreBy Andrew C. McCarthy: It is very simple: The next Supreme Court justice can be chosen by either President Obama or the American people.
Read MoreBy Robert Tracinski: If we understand the history of Supreme Court appointments, we can understand that there is really no such thing as a ‘moderate’ Supreme Court nominee.
Read MoreBy Ilan Wurman: Adhering to the original public meaning of the Constitution doesn’t mean that there is no role for interpretation.
Read MoreBy Bryan Fischer: Judicial activism is like the weather. Everybody talks about it and everybody complains about it, but nobody does anything. Until now.
Read MoreBy Mitchell Rocklin and Howard Slugh
Read More
Here is S. Adam Seagrave writing at Public Discourse: Any defense of constitutional originalism depends on accepting the principles of natural law and natural rights on which the Constitution was founded. Unfortunately, these principles no…
Read MoreBy Hans A. Von Spakovsky
Read MoreBy Christopher C. Horner
Read MoreBy Robert Weissberg: The United States now edges on becoming a kritarchy, a government of judges.
Read More