From Laurie Higgins:
There are multiple reasons to oppose policies and laws that permit people to use opposite-sex restrooms, dressing rooms, and locker rooms, including the risk posed to young girls and women. What’s sickeningly ironic is that “progressives” argue that since many gender-dysphoric women pretending to be men look exactly like actual men, their presence in women’s facilities would be troubling to women. They’re right, but whose fault is that? This entire execrable mess that threatens the safety of women, the privacy of all, and truth rests at the jackbooted feet of “progressives” who now say, in effect, that since they’ve made it this far in fostering confusion, society is obligated to give them a free pass on completing their perverse, deceptive, and subversive cultural project.
…
For those “progressives” who steadfastly refuse to follow an argument, IFI wishes to be clear. Our position is not that all gender-dysphoric men who pretend to be women are violent. Our position is that if objectively male persons are permitted in women’s restrooms, locker rooms, dressing rooms, shelters, and prisons, the risk to girls and women increases. These private facilities should correspond to objective immutable biological sex—not subjective feelings about one’s sex.
Read more and watch the video: Illinois Family Institute
Image credit: www.illinoisfamily.org.
